Population Growth, Density and the Costs of Providing Public Services

Helen F. Ladd

Urban Studies · 1992 · 342 citations · 7 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Policy interest in managing local population growth highlights the fiscal pressures it imposes on local governments. This study aims to disentangle the separate effects of rapid population growth and residential density on local government spending. Using 1985 data from 247 large counties, the authors employ a regression model controlling for other determinants to estimate the nonlinear impacts of growth and density on current account spending, capital outlays, and public‑safety expenditures. The results reveal a U‑shaped relationship between density and spending—higher density generally increases costs except in very low‑density areas—and show that rapid population growth imposes fiscal burdens on residents through reduced service levels.

Abstract

Recent policy interest in managing local population growth has drawn attention to the fiscal pressures that population growth imposes on local governments. This paper uses 1985 data for 247 large county areas to determine the separate impacts on local government spending of two dimensions of residential development patterns, the rapidity of population growth and the intensity of land use as measured by gross residential densities. Based on a regression model that controls for other determinants of per capita spending, this study provides careful estimates of the nonlinear impacts of population growth and population density on three types of local government spending: current account spending, capital outlays and spending on public safety. The study balances the engineering and planning view that greater population density lowers the costs of providing public services by documenting a U-shaped relationship between spending and density; except in sparsely populated areas, higher density typically increases public sector spending. In addition, the results suggest that rapid population growth imposes fiscal burdens on established residents in the form of lower service levels.

References

7