Publication | Closed Access
Why Observational Studies Should Be Among The Tools Used In Comparative Effectiveness Research
203
Citations
25
References
2010
Year
Evidence-based MedicineResearch EvaluationResearch EthicsEffectiveness ResearchMethodology ComparisonClinical TrialsRandomized Controlled TrialObservational ResearchPublic HealthStatisticsObservational StudiesHealth PolicyResearch DesignEvidence-based RecommendationResearch SynthesisComparative Effectiveness ResearchMethodological ArticlePerformance StudiesClinical EffectivenessGood Decision MakingPatient SafetyMedicineEvidence-based PracticeSurvey Methodology
Doctors, patients, and other decision makers need access to the best available clinical evidence, which can come from systematic reviews, experimental trials, and observational research. Despite methodological challenges, high-quality observational studies have an important role in comparative effectiveness research because they can address issues that are otherwise difficult or impossible to study. In addition, many clinical and policy decisions do not require the very high levels of certainty provided by large, rigorous randomized trials. This paper provides insights and a framework to guide good decision making that involves the full range of high-quality comparative effectiveness research techniques, including observational research.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1