Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2014 · 811 citations · 50 references
Social SciencesPsychologySocial PsychologyPersonality PsychologyPsychometricsSocial Media AnalyticsPersonality AssessmentPersonality TraitsPsychological TestingSocial CommunicationSocial MediaTrait TheoryAssessmentsBig Five Personality ModelBig Five Personality TraitsPersonality FacetsPersonality PredictionPersonality Trait MeasurementSelf-report Measures Of PersonalityTest-retest Reliability
Language use is a stable individual difference strongly correlated with personality. The study aims to develop an open‑vocabulary method that assesses personality from social media language. The authors compiled language data from 66,732 Facebook users with self‑reported Big Five scores, trained a predictive model, and applied it to 4,824 users to evaluate convergence with self‑reports, discriminant validity, informant agreement, external correlations, and 6‑month test‑retest reliability. Language‑based personality assessments were found to be valid, agreeing with self‑ and informant reports, discriminating traits, showing expected external correlations, and remaining stable over six months, while also offering rich trait portraits and a low‑cost, scalable alternative to traditional methods.
Language use is a psychologically rich, stable individual difference with well-established correlations to personality. We describe a method for assessing personality using an open-vocabulary analysis of language from social media. We compiled the written language from 66,732 Facebook users and their questionnaire-based self-reported Big Five personality traits, and then we built a predictive model of personality based on their language. We used this model to predict the 5 personality factors in a separate sample of 4,824 Facebook users, examining (a) convergence with self-reports of personality at the domain- and facet-level; (b) discriminant validity between predictions of distinct traits; (c) agreement with informant reports of personality; (d) patterns of correlations with external criteria (e.g., number of friends, political attitudes, impulsiveness); and (e) test-retest reliability over 6-month intervals. Results indicated that language-based assessments can constitute valid personality measures: they agreed with self-reports and informant reports of personality, added incremental validity over informant reports, adequately discriminated between traits, exhibited patterns of correlations with external criteria similar to those found with self-reported personality, and were stable over 6-month intervals. Analysis of predictive language can provide rich portraits of the mental life associated with traits. This approach can complement and extend traditional methods, providing researchers with an additional measure that can quickly and cheaply assess large groups of participants with minimal burden.
50
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Fabián Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2012 · 63.7K citations · Full text
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Lee J. Cronbach, Paul E. Meehl · Psychological Bulletin · 1955 · 10.9K citations · Full text