Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · 1998 · 36 citations · 12 references
Veterinary MedicineRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingUltrasonographyUltrasoundAbdominal ImagingAbdominal UltrasonographyDiagnostic UltrasonographyTransabdominal UltrasonographyAppendiceal UltrasoundDiagnostic Accuracy StudiesDiagnostic Testing AccuracyOperator Dependence In UltrasonographyPositive Predictive ValuePositive Predictive Value AnalysisSupervised Practice
We performed a retrospective study to compare the sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of appendiceal ultrasonography performed by unsupervised technicians during the nighttime hours with studies performed during the day by supervised technicians. Fifty-nine percent of the 163 sonographic examinations were done during the day, and 41% were performed at night. The sensitivity during the day (61%) was significantly higher than at night (26%), as was the positive predictive value (93% day, 71% night). We conclude that ultrasonography is an operator-dependent study. Its sensitivity is so diminished when not performed by an experienced radiologist or technician that a negative examination is not reliable.
12
Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix.
Michel Rioux · American Journal of Roentgenology · 1992 · 242 citations
Appendicitis: usefulness of US in diagnosis in a pediatric population.
C J Sivit, Kurt D. Newman, Douglas A. Boenning et al. · Radiology · 1992 · 176 citations
Medicine, Pediatrics, Radiology +14
Appendicitis diagnosis today: Clinical and ultrasonic deductions
H John, Urs Neff, M Kelemen · World Journal of Surgery · 1993 · 147 citations