Symmetrical twins: On the relationship between Actor-Network theory and the sociology of critical capacities

Michael Guggenheim, Jörg Potthast

European Journal of Social Theory · 2012 · 96 citations · 41 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The article argues that Actor‑Network Theory and the sociology of critical capacities are symmetrical twins, tracing how mutual readings between Latour and Boltanski shaped their development. It identifies three key encounters—explanations for social change, object–place relations, and critique—highlighting how these twin programmes’ evolution informs disciplinary boundaries.

Abstract

This article explores the elective affinities between Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and the sociology of critical capacities. It argues that these two research programmes can be understood as symmetrical twins. We show the extent to which the exchange between Bruno Latour and Luc Boltanski has influenced their respective theoretical developments. Three strong encounters between the twin research programmes may be distinguished. The first encounter concerns explanations for social change. The second encounter focuses on the status of objects and their relationship to places. The third encounter is about the concept of critique. Drawing on their long-term mutual readings, we gain insight into how pleas for symmetrical analysis raised in response to Bourdieu’s theory of fields have evolved within both ANT and the sociology of critical capacity. We conclude by relating the development of the respective research programmes to the issue of disciplinary boundaries.

References

41