Publication | Open Access
Effect of Glutamic Acid on Chick’s Proline Requirement
22
Citations
13
References
1971
Year
NutritionEducationFeed AdditivePublic HealthAnimal PhysiologyVeterinary PhysiologyNutrient PhysiologyAnimal NutritionNutritional ResponseReduced Growth RateProline RequirementBiologyAmino AcidAnimal SciencePhysiologyPoultry FarmingMetabolismNonessential Amino AcidPoultry Science
PROLINE has been considered by nutritionists as a nonessential amino acid for chicks. Its relative abundance in natural proteins made it difficult to determine its role in chick nutrition. Almquist and Grau (1944) fed a purified diet with and without proline to groups off our chicks. They observed that the birds receiving proline showed an immediate gain in weight, whereas those without it showed a reduced growth rate for four days, but after that time they grew at the normal rate. They classified proline as a dispensable amino acid, but reported that there might be conditions under which the chick did not synthesize it rapidly enough for maximum growth. Benton et al. (1955) reported that when 1% l-proline was added to an amino acid diet containing 0.5% l-proline, there was a very small growth response. Roy and Bird (1959) observed that the addition of 0.5 to 2% l-proline to the…
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1