Resilience and Climate Change Adaptation: The Importance of Framing

TLDR

In Australia, policy discourse is shifting from climate‑change impacts and vulnerability to resilience, yet the scientific basis for resilience and its link to climate action remains contested. The authors argue that framing adaptation as resilience shapes agenda setting, the pathways pursued, and the eventual outcomes of adaptation. Using multi‑disciplinary research from three Victorian urban case studies, the authors discuss explicit framing, the rise of resilience in adaptation discourse, and its policy implications.

Abstract

In the Australian policy context, there has recently been a discernible shift in the discourse used when considering responses to the impacts of current weather extremes and future climate change. Commonly used terminology, such as climate change impacts and vulnerability, is now being increasingly replaced by a preference for language with more positive connotations as represented by resilience and a focus on the 'strengthening' of local communities. However, although this contemporary shift in emphasis has largely political roots, the scientific conceptual underpinning for resilience, and its relationship with climate change action, remains contested. To contribute to this debate, the authors argue that how adaptation is framed—in this case by the notion of resilience—can have an important influence on agenda setting, on the subsequent adaptation pathways that are pursued and on eventual adaptation outcomes. Drawing from multi-disciplinary adaptation research carried out in three urban case studies in the State of Victoria, Australia ('Framing multi-level and multi-actor adaptation responses in the Victorian context', funded by the Victorian Centre for Climate Change Adaptation Research (2010–2012)), this article is structured according to three main discussion points. Firstly, the importance of being explicit when framing adaptation; secondly, this study reflects on how resilience is emerging as part of adaptation discourse and narratives in different scientific, research and policy-making communities; and finally, the authors reflect on the implications of resilience framing for evolving adaptation policy and practice.