Publication | Closed Access
URBANIZATION OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS: DEGRADATION THRESHOLDS, STORMWATER DETECTION, AND THE LIMITS OF MITIGATION<sup>1</sup>
1K
Citations
31
References
1997
Year
River Basin ManagementStormwater DetectionEngineeringUrban HydrologyWater ResourcesEnvironmental EngineeringWatershed ManagementDegradation ThresholdsStormwater ManagementHydrologic EngineeringWatershed DegradesWater QualityDetention PondsUrban Water ManagementDownstream Aquatic SystemHydrologyWater Sustainability
Urbanization degrades downstream aquatic form and function rapidly, and existing mitigation methods are often only partially effective. The study used continuous hydrologic modeling to evaluate conventional detention ponds, revealing that their actual performance falls short of design goals. Degradation begins at about 10 % impervious area, lower levels still cause significant damage, and even optimal mitigation cannot prevent resource loss, as continuous modeling shows detention ponds underperform their design.
ABSTRACT: Urbanization of a watershed degrades both the form and the function of the downstream aquatic system, causing changes that can occur rapidly and are very difficult to avoid or correct. A variety of physical data from lowland streams in western Washington displays the onset of readily observable aquatic‐system degradation at a remarkably consistent level of development, typically about ten percent effective impervious area in a watershed. Even lower levels of urban development cause significant degradation in sensitive water bodies and a reduced, but less well quantified, level of function throughout the system as a whole. Unfortunately, established methods of mitigating the downstream impacts of urban development may have only limited effectiveness. Using continuous hydrologic modeling we have evaluated detention ponds designed by conventional event methodologies, and our findings demonstrate serious deficiencies in actual pond performance when compared to their design goals. Even with best efforts at mitigation, the sheer magnitude of development activities falling below a level of regulatory concern suggests that increased resource loss will invariably accompany development of a watershed. Without a better understanding of the critical processes that lead to degradation, some downstream aquatic‐system damage is probably inevitable without limiting the extent of watershed development itself.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1