Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2005 · 127 citations · 13 references
Life SciencesInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyAntimicrobial ResistanceBacteriologyMedical MicrobiologyAntibacterial ResistanceAntibiotic ResistanceAntimicrobial Susceptibility TestingClinical BacteriologyDiagnostic BacteriologyPathogen DetectionAcinetobacter Baumannii ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance TestingAntibiotic Sensitivity TestingAntibiotic Susceptibility TestingBroth MicrodilutionColistin Susceptibility TestingMicrobial Susceptibility TestingResistance In Clinical Isolates
We compared the E-test to the broth microdilution method for testing the susceptibility of 115 clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii to colistin. Twenty-two (19.1%) strains were resistant to colistin and 93 (80.8%) strains were susceptible according to the reference broth microdilution method. A categorical agreement of 98.2% was found, with only two (1.7%) very major errors. Agreement within 1 twofold dilution between the E-test and the broth microdilution was 16.5%. Complete agreement was found for the strains for which MICs fell within the range of 0.25 to 1 microg of colistin/ml. However, there was poor concordance, particularly in extreme dilutions with higher MICs by the E-test method.
13
Anna S. Levin, Antonio Barone, Juliana Penço et al. · Clinical Infectious Diseases · 1999 · 609 citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Pharmacotherapy +16
José Garnacho‐Montero, Carlos Ortíz-Leyba, F. J. Jiménez-Jiménez et al. · Clinical Infectious Diseases · 2003 · 472 citations
Ana Cristina Gales, Adriana O. Reis, Ronald N. Jones · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2001 · 382 citations · Full text