Iterative channel estimation and decoding of pilot symbol assisted turbo codes over flat-fading channels

Matthew C. Valenti, B.D. Woerner

IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2001 · 294 citations · 20 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The paper proposes a method for coherent detection and decoding of turbo‑coded BPSK signals over flat‑fading channels. The approach iteratively refines channel estimates derived from pilot symbols and turbo decoder feedback, comparing hard‑ and soft‑decision updates to baseline systems and exploiting prior‑frame estimates for further performance gains. Simulations demonstrate that the iterative scheme attains performance within 0.49–1.16 dB of perfect coherent detection at a BER of 10⁻⁴ for fade rates of 0.005 and 0.02, with pilot spacing, filter size, and fade rate influencing the results.

Abstract

A method for coherently detecting and decoding turbo-coded binary phase shift keying (BPSK) signals transmitted over frequency-flat fading channels is discussed. Estimates of the complex channel gain and variance of the additive noise are derived first from known pilot symbols and an estimation filter. After each iteration of turbo decoding, the channel estimates are refined using information fed back from the decoder. Both hard-decision and soft-decision feedback are considered and compared with three baseline turbo-coded systems: (1) a BPSK system that has perfect channel estimates; (2) a system that uses differential phase shift keying and hence needs no estimates; and (3) a system that performs channel estimation using pilot symbols but has no feedback path from decoder to estimator. Performance can be further improved by borrowing channel estimates from the previously decoded frame. Simulation results show the influence of pilot symbol spacing, estimation filter size and type, and fade rate. Performance within 0.49 and 1.16 dB of turbo-coded BPSK with perfect coherent detection is observed at a bit-error rate of 10/sup -4/ for normalized fade rates of f/sub d/T/sub s/=0.005 and f/sub d/T/sub s/=0.02, respectively.

References

20