Publication | Closed Access
The Complexity and Distribution of Hard Problems
65
Citations
15
References
1995
Year
Computational Complexity TheoryEngineeringAbstract ComplexityAlgebraic ComplexityHard ProblemsLower BoundComputational ComplexityTime ComplexityComputer ScienceDescriptional ComplexityComputational ProblemCombinatorial OptimizationUpper BoundKolmogorov ComplexityLower BoundsComplexityComplexity Cores
Measure-theoretic aspects of the $\leq _{\text{m}}^{\text{P}}$-reducibility structure of the exponential time complexity classes ${\text{E}} = {\text{DTIME}}(2^{{\text{linear}}} )$ and ${\text{E}}_2 = {\text{DTIME}}(2^{{\text{polynomial}}} )$ are investigated. Particular attention is given to the complexity (measured by the size of complexity cores) and distribution (abundance in the sense of measure) of languages that are $\leq _{\text{m}}^{\text{P}}$-hard for E and other complexity classes. Tight upper and lower bounds on the size of complexity cores of hard languages are derived. The upper bound says that the $\leq _{\text{m}}^{\text{P}}$-hard languages for E are unusually simple, in the sense that they have smaller complexity cores than most languages in E. It follows that the $\leq _{\text{m}}^{\text{P}}$-complete languages for E form a measure 0 subset of E (and similarly in ${\text{E}}_2$). This latter fact is seen to be a special case of a more general theorem, namely, that every$\leq _{\text{m}}^{\text{P}}$-degree (e.g., the degree of all $\leq _{\text{m}}^{\text{P}}$-complete languages for NP) has measure 0 in E and in ${\text{E}}_2$.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1