Circulating markers of prognosis and response to treatment in patients with midgut carcinoid tumours

Graham B. Turner, Brian T. Johnston, David R. McCance, Ann McGinty, R. G. P. Watson, CC Patterson, J. Ardill

Gut · 2006 · 122 citations · 23 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Midgut carcinoid tumours are rare, unpredictable, and lack reliable prognostic markers, and although somatostatin analogues are common, their survival benefit remains unproven. The study aimed to identify prognostic factors and evaluate how biochemical response to somatostatin analogues influences survival in these patients. Clinical and biochemical data from 139 patients seen between 1978 and 2000 were analyzed using univariate, multivariate, and time‑dependent covariate survival models to assess prognostic indicators and biomarker dynamics. Plasma neurokinin A emerged as the sole independent predictor of outcome; patients whose NKA rose despite therapy had markedly poorer survival, and recent NKA values better predicted survival, demonstrating a survival advantage when NKA is altered by somatostatin analogues.

Abstract

Midgut carcinoid tumours are uncommon tumours with an unpredictable clinical behaviour and few useful prognostic markers. Somatostatin analogues are widely used in treatment but a survival advantage has not been proven. We analysed features associated with poor prognosis and assessed the clinical implications of the biochemical response to therapy.Clinical and biochemical data were collected for patients with midgut carcinoid tumours attending a tertiary referral neuroendocrine clinic from 1978 to 2000. Using death as the end point, univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to identify prognostic indicators. The significance of altering biomarkers with therapy was also studied by including repeated measurements of the most prognostic biochemical parameter in a time dependent covariate survival analysis.We identified 139 patients with sufficient data for our analyses. Factors associated with a poor outcome on univariate analysis included: plasma neurokinin A (NKA), urinary 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid output, age, and >/=5 liver metastases. Plasma NKA was the strongest and only independent predictor of outcome on multivariate analysis. Patients in whom NKA continued to rise despite somatostatin analogues had a significantly worse survival than those in whom NKA stabilised or fell (one year survival rate 40% v 87%). Time dependent covariate analysis concluded that survival was better predicted by the most recent plasma NKA value rather than by the initial value.Plasma NKA is an accurate marker of prognosis for midgut carcinoid tumours. This is the first paper to support a survival advantage in patients in whom plasma NKA is altered by somatostatin analogues.

References

23