Journal of Oral Implantology · 2011 · 20 citations · 62 references
DentistryImplant DentistryMechanical Behavior Of MaterialsMechanical Properties Of Dental MaterialsProsthodontic MaterialsImplant BiomechanicsImplant DesignImplant MaterialsImplant-supported CrownsLoading ProtocolsAxial LoadsBiomechanical ResponseBiomechanical Testing Of ImplantsBiomechanics Of Dental ImplantsBiomechanics Of Implant-supported OverdenturesDental Implant BiomechanicsDental ImplantsFinite Element Strain Analysis
This study compared the biomechanical responses of 3 single crowns supported by 3 different implants under axial and off-axial loading. A standard implant (3.75 mm diameter, 13 mm length), a mini implant (3 mm diameter, 13 mm length), and a short-wide implant (5.7 mm diameter, 8 mm length) were embedded in epoxy resin by the aid of a surveyor to ensure their parallelism. Each implant supported a full metal crown made of Ni-Cr alloy with standardized dimensions. Strain gauges and finite element analysis (FEA) were used to measure the strain induced under axial and off-axial functional loads of 300 N. Results showed that mini implants recorded the highest microstrains, under both axial and off-axial loading. All implants showed a considerable increase in strain values under off-axial loading. Standard and short-wide implants proved to be preferable in supporting crowns, as the standard implant showed the lowest strains under axial and off-axial loading using FEA simulation, while the short-wide implant showed the lowest strains under nonaxial loading using strain gauge analysis.
62
Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal
Harold M. Frost · The Anatomical Record · 1987 · 2.1K citations
Contemporary Implant Dentistry
Carl E. Misch · Implant Dentistry · 1999 · 459 citations