Limits to Anthropocentrism: Toward an Ecocentric Organization Paradigm?

Ronald E. Purser, Changkil Park, Alfonso Montuori

Academy of Management Review · 1995 · 263 citations · 89 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The article traces how anthropocentrism, rooted in linear perspective, camera theory, and human‑nature dualism, has become entrenched in organization science and management, producing a disembodied, egocentric form of technological knowing. It critiques anthropocentrism and contrasts it with ecocentric approaches, framing the discussion in terms of environmental management versus ecocentric responsibility paradigms. The analysis concludes that corporate environmentalism and greening‑business practices are grounded in the environmental management paradigm and are incompatible with the ecocentric responsibility paradigm.

Abstract

This article examines the historically constituted dimensions of anthropocentrism, tracing the emergence of linear perspective, a camera theory of knowledge, and the human-nature dualism. These epistemological conventions are socially reproduced in organization science and management practice in their more contemporary anthropocentric forms: a disembodied form of technological knowing conjoined with an egocentric organizational orientation. Following this critique, the paradigmatic differences between anthropocentric and ecocentric approaches for dealing with issues related to the natural environment are discussed in what is referred to respectively as the environmental management and ecocentric responsibility paradigms. Our analysis suggests that corporate environmentalism and so-called “greening-business” approaches are grounded in the environmental management paradigm. It is argued that environmental management approaches are incommensurable with the ecocentric responsibility paradigm. The tensions bet...

References

89