In-vitro activity of meropenem against clinical isolates in a multicentre study in Italy

Abstract

A multicentre in-vitro study was undertaken to evaluate the susceptibility of bacterial pathogens isolated in different Italian hospitals to meropenem. A total of 1399 aerobic and 452 anaerobic strains was analysed. Comparative agents were imipenem, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, piperacillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, amikacin, plus vancomycin when appropriate. The MIC ranges (mg/l) of meropenem were: 0.015-2 for Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Morganella morganii and Providencia spp.; less than 0.008-1 for Escherichia coli; 0.016-32 for Serratia spp.; 0.03-2 for Enterobacter spp. and Citrobacter spp.; 0.03- greater than 128 for Acinetobacter anitratus; 0.03-32 for Pseudomonas spp.; less than 0.008-0.5 for Haemophilus spp. and Neisseria spp.; 0.015-64 for Staphylococcus spp.; 0.06- greater than 128 for Enterococcus spp.; less than 0.008-0.25 for Streptococcus spp.; 0.016-8 for Fusobacterium spp.; 0.03-8 for Bacteroides spp.; less than 0.06-0.5 for anaerobic Gram-positive cocci; 0.08-2 for Clostridium spp. Meropenem exhibited superior antibacterial activity against the aerobic and anaerobic strains tested when compared to the other beta-lactam drugs. The new carbapenem was as active as ciprofloxacin and more active than imipenem and the aminoglycosides against Enterobacteriaceae and Ps. aeruginosa. It was also more active than ciprofloxacin against most strains of Gram-positive cocci. Meropenem was slightly less potent than imipenem against staphylococci and enterococci, with the exception of oxacillin-susceptible Staph. aureus against which meropenem and imipenem exhibited similar antibacterial activity.