RePub (Erasmus University, Rotterdam) · 2007 · 150 citations · 3 references
Open access
BusinessEconomicsFinanceFinancial EconomicsInvestment ManagementPortfolio ManagementAsset AllocationEquity RiskFinancial RiskPortfolio Risk ManagementRisk-return AnalysisVolatility AnalysisBiasesBusiness InvestmentFinancial Market VolatilityLow Volatility InvestingMarket Volatility EffectsRisk-adjusted ValuationStrategic AllocationVolatility
We present empirical evidence that stocks with low volatility earn high risk-adjusted returns. The annual alpha spread of global low versus high volatility decile portfolios amounts to 12% over the 1986-2006 period. We also observe this volatility effect within the US, European and Japanese markets in isolation. Furthermore, we find that the volatility effect cannot be explained by other well-known effects such as value and size. Our results indicate that equity investors overpay for risky stocks. Possible explanations for this phenomenon include (i) leverage restrictions, (ii) inefficient two-step investment processes, and (iii) behavioral biases of private investors. In order to exploit the volatility effect in practice we argue that investors should include low risk stocks as a separate asset class in the strategic asset allocation phase of their investment process.
3
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · The Journal of Finance · 1992 · 15.1K citations · Full text
The Cross‐Section of Volatility and Expected Returns
Andrew Ang, Robert J. Hodrick, Yuhang Xing et al. · The Journal of Finance · 2006 · 4.8K citations