Publication | Open Access
The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits
1.2K
Citations
85
References
2007
Year
CulturePersonality PsychologySocial BehaviorSocial PsychologyGender StudiesCultural DiversityCross-cultural AssessmentGeographic DistributionEnglish BfiEducationSocial SciencesCross-cultural PerspectivePersonality TraitsSexual BehaviorSexual OrientationBig Five InventoryPsychology
The Big Five Inventory (BFI) is a self‑report measure that assesses the high‑order personality traits of Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness. The study uses cross‑cultural BFI data to examine whether the English BFI factor structure replicates across cultures, assess the validity of national trait profiles, and map global personality trait distributions. The authors translated the BFI into 28 languages and administered it to 17,837 participants from 56 countries as part of the International Sexuality Description Project. The five‑factor structure held across major world regions, trait levels correlated with self‑esteem, sociosexuality, and national profiles, and South American and East Asian samples differed significantly in openness compared to other regions.
The Big Five Inventory (BFI) is a self-report measure designed to assess the high-order personality traits of Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness. As part of the International Sexuality Description Project, the BFI was translated from English into 28 languages and administered to 17,837 individuals from 56 nations. The resulting cross-cultural data set was used to address three main questions: Does the factor structure of the English BFI fully replicate across cultures? How valid are the BFI trait profiles of individual nations? And how are personality traits distributed throughout the world? The five-dimensional structure was robust across major regions of the world. Trait levels were related in predictable ways to self-esteem, sociosexuality, and national personality profiles. People from the geographic regions of South America and East Asia were significantly different in openness from those inhabiting other world regions. The discussion focuses on limitations of the current data set and important directions for future research.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1