Journal of Dental Research · 2003 · 337 citations · 6 references
DentistryOrthodonticsOrthopedic SurgeryImplant SurgeryOrthopedicsSurgical OrthodonticsBiomechanics Of AnchorageOrthognathic SurgeryOsseointegration MonitoringBone-implant Contact AssessmentBone-implant InterfaceBone-implant Interface AnalysisBone-to-implant ContactDental ImplantsHealing Period DurationImplant-bone InteractionSurgical Implants
The use of conventional dental implants for orthodontic anchorage is limited by their large size. The purpose of this study was to quantify the histomorphometric properties of the bone-implant interface to analyze the use of small titanium screws as an orthodontic anchorage and to establish an adequate healing period. Overall, successful rigid osseous fixation was achieved by 97% of the 96 implants placed in 8 dogs and 100% of the elastomeric chain-loaded implants. All of the loaded implants remained integrated. Mandibular implants had significantly higher bone-implant contact than maxillary implants. Within each arch, the significant histomorphometric indices noted for the "three-week unloaded" healing group were: increased labeling incidence, higher woven-to-lamellar-bone ratio, and increased osseous contact. Analysis of these data indicates that small titanium screws were able to function as rigid osseous anchorage against orthodontic load for 3 months with a minimal (under 3 weeks) healing period.
6
Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage.
Ryuzo Kanomi · PubMed · 1997 · 923 citations
Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage.
W. Eugene Roberts, Frank R. Helm, Keith J. Marshall et al. · PubMed · 1989 · 353 citations
Masami Ohmae, Shigeru Saito, Tomio Morohashi et al. · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · 2001 · 254 citations