Clinical and Vaccine Immunology · 2014 · 15 citations · 40 references
Veterinary MedicineImmunologyInfectious DiseasesDiagnostic MicrobiologyEarly DetectionMolecular DiagnosticsAntigen Detection AssaysInfectious Disease DetectionLyme DiseasePathogen DetectionSerological DiagnosisSerological DiagnosticsAntibody Detection TestsAntigen Detection TestsBorrelia Burgdorferi InfectionImmunological AssaysPathogen Antigen DetectionSerological Test ValidationThresholds
A serology-based tiered approach has, to date, provided the most effective means of laboratory confirmation of clinically suspected cases of Lyme disease, but it lacks sensitivity in the early stages of disease and is often dependent on subjectively scored immunoblots. We recently demonstrated the use of immuno-PCR (iPCR) for detecting Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies in patient serum samples that were positive for Lyme disease. To better understand the performance of the Lyme disease iPCR assay, the repeatability and variability of the background of the assay across samples from a healthy population (n = 36) were analyzed. Both of these parameters were found to have coefficients of variation of <3%. Using eight antigen-specific iPCR assays and positive call thresholds established for each assay, iPCR IgM and/or IgG diagnosis from Lyme disease patient serum samples (n = 12) demonstrated a strong correlation with that of 2-tier testing. Furthermore, a simplified iPCR approach using a single hybrid antigen and detecting only IgG antibodies confirmed the 2-tier diagnosis in the Lyme disease patient serum samples (n = 12). Validation of the hybrid antigen IgG iPCR assay using a blinded panel of Lyme disease and non-Lyme disease patient serum samples (n = 92) resulted in a sensitivity of 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50% to 84%), compared to that of the 2-tier analysis at 59% (95% CI, 41% to 76%), and a specificity of 98% (95% CI, 91% to 100%) compared to that of the 2-tier analysis at 97% (95% CI, 88% to 100%). A single-tier hybrid antigen iPCR assay has the potential to be an improved method for detecting host-generated antibodies against B. burgdorferi.
40
Surveillance for Lyme Disease — United States, 2008–2015
Amy Schwartz, Alison F. Hinckley, Paul S. Mead et al. · MMWR Surveillance Summaries · 2017 · 903 citations · Full text
Surveillance for Lyme disease--United States, 1992-1998.
Kathleen A. Orloski, Edward B. Hayes, Grant L. Campbell et al. · PubMed · 2000 · 577 citations
Statistical significance of quantitative PCR
Yann Karlen, Alan Mcnair, Sébastien Perseguers et al. · BMC Bioinformatics · 2007 · 370 citations · Full text