Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · 2003 · 119 citations · 25 references
Public HealthHealth PolicyHuman Rights LawMedical EthicsResearch EthicsRights Of Persons With DisabilitiesConsentDisability EthicsDisability RightsConsent In Clinical ResearchConsent In Vulnerable PopulationsConsent To Research ParticipationEthical Aspects Of ConsentExploitative ConductInformed ConsentIntellectual Disability EthicsRight To Consent
Background People with severe intellectual disability are considered vulnerable to exploitation in research. Discovery of exploitative practices in recent history has motivated the development of guidelines for informed consent and proxy decision‐making procedures when involving these individuals in research. Methods Issues for determining capability to provide informed consent and the proxy decision process are reviewed according to the literature, current ethics guidelines and recent legislature in Victoria, Australia. Results The complex process of involving in research people with severe intellectual disability who are particularly vulnerable by virtue of their institutionalized residential status is discussed within the context of a recent project into examining potential nutritional determinants of Pica behaviour (i.e. the eating of inedible items). Conclusions This example serves to highlight the role of legislation, various government bodies and researchers in balancing principles of protection of vulnerable groups and rights to self‐determination.
25
Henry K. Beecher · New England Journal of Medicine · 1966 · 1.9K citations
Public Health, Surgery, Ethics +5
Competence of Depressed Patients for Consent to Research
Paul S. Appelbaum, Thomas Grisso, Ellen Frank et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry · 1999 · 279 citations
Lynn C. Epstein · Archives of Internal Medicine · 1969 · 201 citations