Radiology · 2006 · 41 citations · 19 references
MedicineRadiologySurgeryDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyGenitourinary RadiologyComputed TomographyDonor EvaluationGenitourinary ImagingRenal ImagingScanning TechniquesVascular ImagingDiagnostic ConfidenceDonor Kidney EvaluationLiving Kidney Donor AssessmentMedical Records ReviewPelvicalyceal System AnatomyRenal Artery ImagingRenal Morphology AssessmentUrographic Imaging
PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the sensitivity and specificity of three-dimensional (3D) 16-section computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of vessels, pelvicalyceal system, and ureters in living renal donors, with surgical findings as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a HIPAA-compliant study. Institutional review board approval was obtained for the review of subjects' medical records and data analysis, with waiver of informed consent. Forty-six renal donors (18 men, 28 women; mean age, 42 years) were examined with 16-section CT. Two blinded reviewers independently studied renal vascular and urographic anatomy of each donor CT scans by fist using 3D images alone, then transverse images alone, and finally transverse and 3D data set. Image quality, degree of diagnostic confidence, and time used for review were recorded. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: For 3D images, transverse images, and transverse in conjunction with 3D data sets, the respective sensitivity and specificity of CT in evaluation of accessory arteries by reviewer 1 were 100% and 100%, 89% and 100%, and 100% and 100%, and those by reviewer 2 were 89% and 97%, 89% and 100%, and 89% and 100%; the respective sensitivity and specificity in evaluation of venous anomalies by reviewer 1 were 100% and 98%, 100% and 98%, and 100% and 98%, and those by reviewer 2 were 100% and 98%, 100% and 95%, and 100% and 98%. For focused comprehensive assessment of renal donors with 3D scans alone, a reviewer on average (average of reviewers 1 and 2) used 2.4 minutes per scan, demonstrated full confidence in 93%, and rated the quality as excellent in 76%. CONCLUSION: For focused assessment of renal vascular and urographic anatomy, review of 3D data set alone provides high sensitivity and specificity with regard to findings seen at surgery.
19
Cynthia Cohen, Robert A. Montgomery, Louis R. Kavoussi et al. · Transplantation · 2001 · 243 citations
Medicine, Nephrology, Surgery +14
Helical CT evaluation of potential kidney donors: findings in 154 subjects.
J F Platt, J H Ellis, Melvyn Korobkin et al. · American Journal of Roentgenology · 1997 · 131 citations
Medicine, Nephrology, Radiology +17
Living Donor Kidneys: Usefulness of Multi–Detector Row CT for Comprehensive Evaluation
Jeong-Kon Kim, Soo-Youn Park, Heon-Joon Kim et al. · Radiology · 2003 · 98 citations