De la ficha terminológica a la ficha traductológica

Fernando Prieto Ramos, Mariana Orozco Jutorán

Babel Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation / Revista Internacional de Traducción · 2015 · 44 citations · 8 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Traditional bilingual legal dictionaries are limited because they cannot adequately handle the complex variables that mediate between asymmetrical legal realities. The study proposes a new approach to developing terminological resources that meets legal translators’ real needs and incorporates advances in Legal Translation Studies. The authors illustrate the paradigm shift with a terminological database for English‑Spanish translation of U.S. software license agreements into Spain, featuring translation‑oriented entries that include contextual comments on the acceptability of terminological options derived from comparative legal analysis.

Abstract

The complex variables involved in mediating between asymmetrical legal realities explain, to a great extent, the limitations of traditional terminological resources (particularly, bilingual legal dictionaries) as working tools for legal translators. After a brief review of these limitations, a new approach to the development of terminological resources is presented that responds to the real needs of legal translators and draws on advances in Legal Translation Studies. This change of paradigm is illustrated by a terminological database designed for the English-Spanish translation of technological law, more precisely, for the localization of software license agreements (mostly from the United States) for Spain. The lexicographical work is contextualized, and the features and advantages of the proposed terminological entries are described in detail. These entries are called “translation-oriented terminological entries” ( fichas traductológicas ) because of their distinctive translation dimension, particularly the inclusion of comments on the acceptability of terminological options on the basis of comparative legal analysis in different translation scenarios. This aspect greatly contributes to the added value of the approach, which is intended as a model for similar applications in legal translation.

References

8