Concepedia

Direct comparison of the FibroScan XL and M probes for assessment of liver fibrosis in obese and nonobese patients

Sebastian Mueller, E Durango, Helmut K. Seitz, Cornelia Ursula Kunz, Gilles Pomier–Layrargues, Duarte-Rojo, Beaton, Elkhashab, Myers

Hepatic Medicine Evidence and Research · 2013 · 42 citations · 29 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Abstract

Liver stiffness can be measured in significantly more obese and nonobese patients using the XL probe than the M probe. However, the XL probe is less accurate and adjusted cutoff values are required.

References

29

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT

J Martin Bland, DouglasG. Altman · The Lancet · 1986 · 47K citations

, , +9

Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement

John M. Bland, Douglas G. Altman · International Journal of Nursing Studies · 2010 · 4K citations

, , +9

Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis

Laurent Sandrin, Bertrand Fourquet, Jean-Michel Hasquenoph et al. · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · 2003 · 2.7K citations

, , +15

Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

Laurent Castéra, Julien Vergniol, Juliette Foucher et al. · Gastroenterology · 2005 · 2.5K citations

, , +14

A New Biometrical Procedure for Testing the Equality of Measurements from Two Different Analytical Methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part I

H. Passing, W. Bablok · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · 1983 · 1.5K citations · Full text

, , +29