Strength Imbalances and Prevention of Hamstring Injury in Professional Soccer Players

Jean‐Louis Croisier, S. Ganteaume, Johnny Binet, M. Genty, Jean-Marcel Ferret

The American Journal of Sports Medicine · 2008 · 956 citations · 24 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The relationship between muscle injury and strength disorders remains controversial. The study aimed to determine whether preseason strength variables predict hamstring strain and whether normalizing strength imbalances reduces injury incidence. Players were assessed with standardized concentric and eccentric isokinetic testing and then classified into four groups based on imbalance management. Untreated strength imbalances raised hamstring injury risk (RR 4.66), imbalances with compensatory training but no final test still had higher risk (RR 2.89), whereas normalizing imbalances reduced risk to near that of players without imbalances (RR 1.43), demonstrating that isokinetic intervention and strength normalization lower injury incidence.

Abstract

The relationship between muscle injury and strength disorders remains a matter of controversy.Professional soccer players performed a preseason isokinetic testing aimed at determining whether (1) strength variables could be predictors of subsequent hamstring strain and (2) normalization of strength imbalances could reduce the incidence of hamstring injury.Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 1.A standardized concentric and eccentric isokinetic assessment was used to identify soccer players with strength imbalances. Subjects were classified among 4 subsets according to the imbalance management content. Recording subsequent hamstring injuries allowed us to define injury frequencies and relative risks between groups.Of 687 players isokinetically tested in preseason, a complete follow-up was obtained in 462 players, for whom 35 hamstring injuries were recorded. The rate of muscle injury was significantly increased in subjects with untreated strength imbalances in comparison with players showing no imbalance in preseason (relative risk = 4.66; 95% confidence interval: 2.01-10.8). The risk of injury remained significantly higher in players with strength imbalances who had subsequent compensating training but no final isokinetic control test than in players without imbalances (relative risk = 2.89; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-8.32). Conversely, normalizing the isokinetic parameters reduced the risk factor for injury to that observed in players without imbalances (relative risk = 1.43; 95% confidence interval: 0.44-4.71).The outcomes showed that isokinetic intervention gives rise to the preseason detection of strength imbalances, a factor that increases the risk of hamstring injury. Restoring a normal strength profile decreases the muscle injury incidence.

References

24