Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service utilisation

TLDR

Health planning requires data on prevalence, disability, and service use. The study aims to estimate the prevalence of ICD‑10 disorders and their comorbidity, disability, and service utilisation. A national probability sample of Australian households was surveyed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview and related measures. In a sample of 10,641 adults, 23% reported a disorder in the past year and 14% a current disorder; comorbidity was linked to disability and service use, yet only 35% of those with a mental disorder sought care (mostly general practitioners) and only half of disabled or comorbid individuals consulted, with many citing no need, underscoring a public health problem rooted in patient knowledge and physician competence.

Abstract

Background Health planning should be based on data about prevalence, disability and services used. Aims To determine the prevalence of ICD–10 disorders and associated comorbidity, disability and service utilisation. Method We surveyed a national probability sample of Australian households using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview and other measures. Results The sample size was 10 641 adults, response rate 78%. Close to 23% reported at least one disorder in the past 12 months and 14% a current disorder. Comorbidity was associated with disability and service use. Only 35% of people with a mental disorder in the 12 months prior to the survey had consulted for a mental problem during that year, and most had seen a general practitioner. Only half of those who were disabled or had multiple comorbidity had consulted and of those who had not, more than half said they did not need treatment. Conclusions The high rate of not consulting among those with disability and comorbidity is an important public health problem. As Australia has a universal health insurance scheme, the barriers to effective care must be patient knowledge and physician competence.