Journal of orthopaedic surgery · 2014 · 15 citations · 20 references
Health ProfessionsOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryFoot AnatomyMovement AnalysisOrthopedic BiomechanicsFlexibility AssessmentFoot ArchesForefoot AnatomyLower Extremity Function AssessmentMetatarsal BonesCaliper CorrectionCaliper MeasurementFlexibilityForefoot FlexibilityForefoot MorphometryMetatarsal BiomechanicsThree-dimensional Motion CaptureTransverse Arch Analysis
PURPOSE: To measure the percentage of the transverse arch length (%TAL) in 2 positions using a 3-dimensional motion capture system to determine the flexibility of the transverse arch of the forefoot. METHODS: 19 men and 10 women with no lower extremity injury or deformity were included. The %TAL of the left foot was measured using a digital caliper in the standing position and the lower leg maximum anterior tilting (LMAT) position. The difference in the %TAL between the 2 positions (δ%TAL) was calculated. 10 markers were mounted on skin over each metatarsal head and base of the left foot. Motion was captured using a 3-dimensional motion capture system. Coordinates of each marker were manually digitised. The percentage of the transverse arch height (%TAH) and angle between the first and fifth metatarsals (M1M5) were calculated, and differences in each forefoot parameter in the 2 positions were defined as δ%TAL, δ%TAH, δM1M5, and the fore foot flexibility magnitude (FFM) was calculated. Subjects were divided into 3 groups based on their δ%TAL: <25th percentile (hypo-flexibility group, n=7), >26th percentile to <74th percentile (control group, n=15), and >75th percentile (hyperflexibility group, n=7). The 3 groups were compared in terms of the δ%TAL. δ%TAH, δM1M5, and FFM. RESULTS: The δ%TAL correlated with δM1M5 (r=0.61, p<0.001) and FFM (r=0.60, p=0.001). For the δM1M5, the hyper-flexibility group differed significantly from other groups (p=0.01). For the FFM, the hyperflexibility group differed significantly from the hypoflexibility group (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Measurement of the %TAL in both the standing and LMAT positions provides a simple and quantitative method of assessing the flexibility of the transverse arch of the forefoot.
20
Foot kinematics during walking measured using bone and surface mounted markers
Christopher Nester, Richard Jones, A. Liu et al. · Journal of Biomechanics · 2007 · 242 citations · Full text