Nordic Journal of Linguistics · 1995 · 172 citations · 17 references
Language StudiesLinguisticsPhilosophy Of LanguageSemanticsSyntaxComparative SemanticsLexical SemanticsSpatial RelationsSpatial SyntaxSyntax-semantics InterfaceLinguistic ExpressionRelational MeaningRelational SemanticsSelectional RestrictionsSemantic TypesSpatial LanguageSpatial MeaningSpatial Relationality
The local semantics approach to analyzing locative particles is examined, criticized, and rejected. The paper argues for an alternative distributed approach to spatial relational semantics and its linguistic expression. The authors contend that spatial relational semantics are not solely carried by locative particles, contrast covertly distributed semantics in English with overtly distributed semantics in other languages, and critique assumptions about universal expression by closed syntactic classes. The study rejects the local semantics approach, critiques universal assumptions about closed syntactic classes, and shows that shifting to distributed semantics allows re‑analysis of polysemy and use‑type in language‑specific spatial relational semantics.
The “local semantics” approach to the analysis of the meaning of locative particles (e.g. spatial prepositions) is examined, criticized and rejected. An alternative, distributed approach to spatial relational semantics and its linguistic expression is argued for. In the first part of the paper, it is argued that spatial relational semantic information is not exclusively carried in languages such as English by the locative particle, and that “item-specific meanings plus selectional restrictions” cannot save the localist approach. In the second part of the paper, the “covertly” distributed spatial relational semantics of languages such as English is contrasted with the “overtly” distributed spatial relational semantics characterizing many other languages. Some common assumptions relating to the universality of the expression of spatial relational meaning by closed syntactic classes are criticized. A change of perspective from “local” to “distributed” semantics permits the re-analysis of polysemy and item-bound “use-type” in terms of the distributed expression of language-specific spatial relational semantic types.
17
Ronald W. Langacker · Cognitive Linguistics · 1990 · 555 citations
Vagueness's puzzles, polysemy's vagaries
Dirk Geeraerts · Cognitive Linguistics · 1993 · 422 citations