Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 1990 · 37 citations · 0 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsExtragalactic AstronomyObservational AstronomyGalaxy EvolutionGalaxy FormationGalaxy MorphologyObservational CosmologyRedshift SurveysDeep Field SurveysGalaxy Evolution With RedshiftGalaxy Redshift SurveysHigh-redshift GalaxiesHigh-redshift Galaxy SurveysLow Surface Brightness GalaxiesNormal GalaxiesSpiral Galaxy Evolution
The most visible galaxies – that is, those which have the largest apparent sizes and isophotal luminosities when seen at a given distance – are those with a particular observed surface brightness (basically because both high- and low-surface brightness objects, of a given total luminosity, necessarily have smaller isophotal sizes and fainter isophotal luminosities at the detection threshold). Extending this argument to high-redshift galaxies, it is clear that this optimum surface brightness moves progressively to brighter intrinsic surface brightnesses, so as to counteract the effect of K -corrections and cosmological dimming. Thus the galaxies appearing in faint surveys will be from a population distinctly different from those ‘normal’ galaxies observed nearby. Galaxies in deep surveys are more likely to be spirals and to be of high surface brightness (and thus high star-formation rate, high infrared luminosity and high radio power). This has very important implications for observational studies of galaxy evolution, such as galaxy number counts, redshift surveys and the direct comparison of local and distant samples (e.g. the Butcher–Oemler effect). In particular, these distance-dependent selection biases can mimic evolutionary changes where none exist (or can help to hide real evolution), and can distort the observed luminosity function at high z.