Using Machine Learning to Break Visual Human Interaction Proofs (HIPs)

Kumar Chellapilla, Patrice Y. Simard

Neural Information Processing Systems · 2004 · 246 citations · 5 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Machine learning is often used to automatically solve human tasks. The study seeks tasks where machine learning underperforms humans to understand current limitations. The authors examined Human Interactive Proofs that separate humans from computers, focusing on those combining segmentation and recognition challenges. They found that most HIPs are simple recognition tasks that machine learning can break, that adding segmentation tasks most effectively confuses algorithms, and that this enabled the creation of robust HIPs deployed in MSN Passport and the design of challenging segmentation tasks.

Abstract

Machine learning is often used to automatically solve human tasks. In this paper, we look for tasks where machine learning algorithms are not as good as humans with the hope of gaining insight into their current limitations. We studied various Human Interactive Proofs (HIPs) on the market, because they are systems designed to tell computers and humans apart by posing challenges presumably too hard for computers. We found that most HIPs are pure recognition tasks which can easily be broken using machine learning. The harder HIPs use a combination of segmentation and recognition tasks. From this observation, we found that building segmentation tasks is the most effective way to confuse machine learning algorithms. This has enabled us to build effective HIPs (which we deployed in MSN Passport), as well as design challenging segmentation tasks for machine learning algorithms.

References

5