Radiation Oncology · 2014 · 12 citations · 8 references
EngineeringRadiation OncologyHazard IdentificationRadiation SafetyRisk AssessmentDevice SafetyMedical Device DesignMedical Device Quality AssuranceMedical Device Risk ManagementMedical Device SafetyMedical Device StandardsDevice Hazard AnalysisMedical Device Safety ManagementSafety TestingSoftware As A Medical DeviceSoftware Development Life CycleSoftware Lifecycle StandardsSoftware Risk ManagementTreatment Parameters
BACKGROUND: According to the latest amendment of the Medical Device Directive standalone software qualifies as a medical device when intended by the manufacturer to be used for medical purposes. In this context, the EN 62304 standard is applicable which defines the life-cycle requirements for the development and maintenance of medical device software. A pilot project was launched to acquire skills in implementing this standard in a hospital-based environment (in-house manufacture). METHODS: The EN 62304 standard outlines minimum requirements for each stage of the software life-cycle, defines the activities and tasks to be performed and scales documentation and testing according to its criticality. The required processes were established for the pre-existent decision-support software FlashDumpComparator (FDC) used during the quality assurance of treatment-relevant beam parameters. As the EN 62304 standard implicates compliance with the EN ISO 14971 standard on the application of risk management to medical devices, a risk analysis was carried out to identify potential hazards and reduce the associated risks to acceptable levels. RESULTS: The EN 62304 standard is difficult to implement without proper tools, thus open-source software was selected and integrated into a dedicated development platform. The control measures yielded by the risk analysis were independently implemented and verified, and a script-based test automation was retrofitted to reduce the associated test effort. After all documents facilitating the traceability of the specified requirements to the corresponding tests and of the control measures to the proof of execution were generated, the FDC was released as an accessory to the HIT facility. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the EN 62304 standard was time-consuming, and a learning curve had to be overcome during the first iterations of the associated processes, but many process descriptions and all software tools can be re-utilized in follow-up projects. It has been demonstrated that a standards-compliant development of small and medium-sized medical software can be carried out by a small team with limited resources in a clinical setting. This is of particular relevance as the upcoming revision of the Medical Device Directive is expected to harmonize and tighten the current legal requirements for all European in-house manufacturers.
8
The heidelberg ion therapy center
T. Haberer, Jürgen Debus, H. Eickhoff et al. · Radiotherapy and Oncology · 2004 · 232 citations
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with Gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
Daniel Habermehl, Kerstin A. Kessel, Thomas Welzel et al. · Radiation Oncology · 2012 · 92 citations · Full text
First experiences in treatment of low-grade glioma grade I and II with proton therapy
Henrik Hauswald, Stefan Rieken, Swantje Ecker et al. · Radiation Oncology · 2012 · 59 citations · Full text