Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: Estimates of Radiation-Related Cancer Risks

671

Citations

47

References

2007

Year

TLDR

Further studies will be important to better assess the role of tobacco and other occupational exposures in our risk estimates. The study aimed to provide direct estimates of cancer risk following protracted low doses of ionizing radiation. It analyzed 407,391 nuclear industry workers with 5.2 million person‑years of individually monitored external radiation exposure. The study found a dose‑dependent increase in all‑cause and cancer mortality, with the strongest effect for lung cancer, and highlighted a healthy‑worker survivor bias, making it the largest analysis of low‑dose protracted radiation exposure to date.

Abstract

A 15-Country collaborative cohort study was conducted to provide direct estimates of cancer risk following protracted low doses of ionizing radiation. Analyses included 407,391 nuclear industry workers monitored individually for external radiation and 5.2 million person-years of follow-up. A significant association was seen between radiation dose and all-cause mortality [excess relative risk (ERR) 0.42 per Sv, 90% CI 0.07, 0.79; 18,993 deaths]. This was mainly attributable to a dose-related increase in all cancer mortality (ERR/Sv 0.97, 90% CI 0.28, 1.77; 5233 deaths). Among 31 specific types of malignancies studied, a significant association was found for lung cancer (ERR/Sv 1.86, 90% CI 0.49, 3.63; 1457 deaths) and a borderline significant (P = 0.06) association for multiple myeloma (ERR/Sv 6.15, 90% CI <0, 20.6; 83 deaths) and ill-defined and secondary cancers (ERR/Sv 1.96, 90% CI -0.26, 5.90; 328 deaths). Stratification on duration of employment had a large effect on the ERR/Sv, reflecting a strong healthy worker survivor effect in these cohorts. This is the largest analytical epidemiological study of the effects of low-dose protracted exposures to ionizing radiation to date. Further studies will be important to better assess the role of tobacco and other occupational exposures in our risk estimates.

References

YearCitations

Page 1