A Non-Occidentalist West?

TLDR

The article challenges the prevailing narrative that the West is uniquely superior, arguing that many Western ideas were sidelined because they conflicted with capitalist and colonial agendas, leaving space for a non‑Occidentalist conception of the West. It aims to examine three areas—antiquity, modern science, and future teleology—to explore alternative Western perspectives. The author illustrates this by drawing on Lucian of Samosata, Nicholas of Cusa, and Blaise Pascal, whose ideas exemplify paths such as learned ignorance, ecological knowledge, wagering on alternate worlds, and artisanal practices toward a non‑capitalist, non‑colonialist intercultural dialogue.

Abstract

In this article I argue that, in spite of the apparently unshakable hegemony of the historical, philosophical and sociological arguments invoked by the canonical history of Europe and the world to demonstrate the uniqueness of the West and its superiority, there is room to think of a non-Occidentalist West. By that I mean a vast array of conceptions, theories, arguments that, though produced in the West by recognized intellectual figures, were discarded, marginalized or ignored because they did not fit the political objectives of capitalism and colonialism at the roots of Western modernity. In the article I tackle specifically three topics: the conceptions of antiquity, modern science and a teleology of the future. Among many others who might be selected, I resort to three eccentric figures — Lucian of Samosata, Nicholas of Cusa and Blaise Pascal — to exemplify some of the paths that might guide us in the construction of a non-capitalist, non-colonialist inter-cultural dialogue. Such paths are here designated as those of learned ignorance, ecology of knowledge, wager on another possible world and artisanship of practices.