Applied Clinical Informatics · 2013 · 64 citations · 37 references
High‑quality reporting of health informatics evaluation studies is essential for evidence‑based practice, and the 2009 STARE‑HI statement offers a set of recommended reporting elements. This paper elaborates the STARE‑HI principles and supplies explanatory examples to aid authors and readers of health informatics evaluation studies. A multidisciplinary team of methodologists, researchers, and editors reviewed the 35 STARE‑HI items, extending each with literature examples and detailed explanations. The STARE‑HI statement and its elaboration enhance reporting quality, enabling readers to assess study validity and generalizability and thereby better exploit the evidence. The applicability of these principles will evolve as they are applied in practice.
Improving the quality of reporting of evaluation studies in health informatics is an important requirement towards the vision of evidence-based health informatics. The STARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in health informatics, published in 2009, provides guidelines on the elements to be contained in an evaluation study report. To elaborate on and provide a rationale for the principles of STARE-HI and to guide authors and readers of evaluation studies in health informatics by providing explanatory examples of reporting. A group of methodologists, researchers and editors prepared the present elaboration of the STARE-HI statement and selected examples from the literature. The 35 STARE-HI items to be addressed in evaluation papers describing health informatics interventions are discussed one by one and each is extended with examples and elaborations. The STARE-HI statement and this elaboration document should be helpful resources to improve reporting of both quantitative and qualitative evaluation studies. Evaluation manuscripts adhering to the principles will enable readers of such papers to better place the studies in a proper context and judge their validity and generalizability, and thus in turn optimize the exploitation of the evidence contained therein. This paper is based on experiences of a group of editors, reviewers, authors of systematic reviews and readers of the scientific literature. The applicability of the details of these principles has to evolve as a function of their use in practice.
37
Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger et al. · PLoS Medicine · 2007 · 21.1K citations · Full text
Observational Studies, Retrospective Cohort Study, Meta-analysis +15
Role of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in Facilitating Medication Errors
Ross Koppel · JAMA · 2005 · 2.1K citations