Publication | Closed Access
Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism: Pattern and Process in the Coevolution of Body Size in Males and Females
1K
Citations
135
References
1997
Year
Breeding BehaviorFitnessFemale-biased SsdSexual SelectionAnthropometric IndicatorReproductive BiologyLocomotor PerformanceBody CompositionSexual Size DimorphismMammalogySex DifferencesEvolutionary SignificanceHealth SciencesAllometric StudyGenetic VariationSex DifferencePopulation GeneticsSexual BehaviorBiologyBody SizePhysiologyEvolutionary BiologyMedicine
Sexual size dimorphism is widespread across plants and animals, varies with body size within clades, and is thought to arise from sexual or reproductive selection, yet quantitative allometric assessments in plants and aquatic species remain scarce. The study aims to test whether correlational selection between sexes drives the evolution of allometric SSD. The authors quantified SSD allometry by regressing log(male size) on log(female size) across 40 independent terrestrial animal clades, using the slope β to indicate deviation from isometry. The analysis revealed that β > 1 in most clades, supporting Rensch's rule that SSD increases with size when males are larger and decreases when females are larger, with rare female‑biased exceptions.
Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is common in both plants and animals, and current evidence suggests that it reflects the adaptation of males and females to their different reproductive roles. When species are compared within a clade, SSD is frequently found to vary with body size. This allometry is detected as β ≠ 1, where β is the slope of a model II regression of log(male size) on log(female size). Most frequently, β exceeds 1, indicating that SSD increases with size where males are the larger sex, but decreases with size where females are larger, a trend formalized as “Rensch's rule.” Exceptions are uncommon and associated with female-biased SSD. These trends are derived from a sample of 40 independent clades of terrestrial animals, primarily vertebrates. Their extension to plants and aquatic animals awaits quantitative assessments of allometry for SSD within these groups. Many functional hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of allometry for SSD, most featuring sexual selection on males or reproductive selection on females. Of these, the hypothesis that allometry evolves because of correlational selection between the sexes appears most promising as a general model but remains untested.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1