BioMed Research International · 2011 · 24 citations · 20 references
Life SciencesBioinformaticsMolecular BiologyComputational BiologyGene ExpressionMachine LearningEnsemble MethodsRna-binding ProteinsMachine Learning Scoring ModelsMajority VotingMajority Voting SystemsMessenger Rna Binding ProteinsProtein AnnotationProtein-protein Interaction PredictionRna-protein RecognitionVoting Classifiers
It is important to identify which proteins can interact with RNA for the purpose of protein annotation, since interactions between RNA and proteins influence the structure of the ribosome and play important roles in gene expression. This paper tries to identify proteins that can interact with RNA using voting systems. Firstly through Weka, 34 learning algorithms are chosen for investigation. Then simple majority voting system (SMVS) is used for the prediction of RNA-binding proteins, achieving average ACC (overall prediction accuracy) value of 79.72% and MCC (Matthew's correlation coefficient) value of 59.77% for the independent testing dataset. Then mRMR (minimum redundancy maximum relevance) strategy is used, which is transferred into algorithm selection. In addition, the MCC value of each classifier is assigned to be the weight of the classifier's vote. As a result, best average MCC values are attained when 22 algorithms are selected and integrated through weighted votes, which are 64.70% for the independent testing dataset, and ACC value is 82.04% at this moment.
20
PISCES: a protein sequence culling server
Guoli Wang, Roland L. Dunbrack · Bioinformatics · 2003 · 1.8K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Bioinformatics, Protein Structure Prediction +16
Prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins from amino acid sequence
Michael Terribilini, Jae‐Hyung Lee, Changhui Yan et al. · RNA · 2006 · 180 citations · Full text