Journal of Periodontology · 2013 · 46 citations · 24 references
DentistryPeriodonticsPeriodontologyAnterior Restorative DentistryCervical DiseasePeriodontal MedicineCervical Lesion RestorationsPeriodontal ExaminationPeriodontal Status EvaluationCervical Lesion CoverageClinical Attachment Level AssessmentNon-carious Cervical Lesion RestorationsNoncarious Cervical Lesion RestorationsNoncarious Cervical LesionsPeriodontal Recession ManagementSoft Tissue Coverage ManagementSoft Tissue Defect Coverage
BACKGROUND: The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the 2-year term results of gingival recession (GR) associated with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) treated by connective tissue graft (CTG) alone or in combination with a resin-modified glass ionomer restoration (CTG+R). METHODS: Thirty-six patients with Miller Class I buccal GR associated with NCCLs completed the follow-up. The defects were randomly assigned to receive either CTG or CTG+R. Bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), relative GR, clinical attachment level (CAL), and cervical lesion height coverage were measured at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment. RESULTS: Both groups showed statistically significant gains in CAL and soft-tissue coverage. The differences between groups were not statistically significant in BOP, PD, relative GR, or CAL after 2 years. Cervical lesion height coverage was 79.31% ± 18.51% for CTG and 71.95% ± 13.25% for CTG+R (P >0.05). Estimated root coverage was 91.56% ± 11.74% for CTG and 93.29% ± 7.97% for CTG+R (P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that both procedures provide comparable soft tissue coverage after 2 years of follow-up.
24
Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque.
Gingival sulcus bleeding--a leading symptom in initial gingivitis.
H.R. Mühlemann, Seok Il Son · PubMed · 1971 · 1.1K citations
A classification of marginal tissue recession.