Coping with Europe: the impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy

Christoph Knill, Andrea Lenschow

Journal of European Public Policy · 1998 · 376 citations · 17 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Implementation of EU legislation is heavily influenced by national administrative traditions, which vary across countries and affect how policies are transposed and applied. The study examines how British and German administrative traditions shape EU environmental policy implementation. The authors argue that implementation effectiveness depends more on how embedded existing structures are than on the actual costs of adaptation. Keywords: environmental policy, EU implementation, neo‑institutionalism, public administration; funded by DG XI of the European Commission.

Abstract

ABSTRACT A central problem for improving the implementation effectiveness of European legislation lies in the impact of national administrative traditions. The dependence on national administrations for implementing European policies implies that the formal transposition and practical application of supranational policies are crucially influenced by administrative traditions prevalent in a certain policy field, which may differ substantially from country to country. Focusing on the implementation of EU environmental policy in Britain and Germany, it is the objective of this article to investigate the interplay of national administrative traditions and European policy implementation in closer detail. The main argument is that the extent to which administrative traditions affect implementation effectiveness is less dependent on the 'real' costs of adaptation than on the level of embeddedness of existing structures. KEY WORDS : Environmental policyEuropean Unionimplementationneoinstitutionalismpublic administration Additional informationNotes on contributorsAndrea Lenschow We gratefully acknowledge helpful comments provided by Markus Haverland. Adrienne Héritier, Yves Mény, Alberta Sbragia and two anonymous reviewers. The funding for the empirical research was provided by DG XI of the European Commission.

References

17