Full-Field Digital Mammographic Interpretation With Prior Analog Versus Prior Digitized Analog Mammography: Time for Interpretation

Abstract

There is a statistically significant 32.1% average improvement in interpretation time when FFDM screening mammograms use digitized analog comparison mammograms than if FFDM is interpreted with the original analog film mammograms. This should allow more FFDMs to be interpreted in the same amount of time if digitized prior analog mammograms are used.