Non-Sinusoidal Bending Waves of Sperm Flagella*

Charles J. Brokaw

Journal of Experimental Biology · 1965 · 224 citations · 13 references

Concepts

TL;DR

High‑resolution photomicrographs of sperm flagella from a sea urchin, tunicate, and annelid were obtained. The flagellum is modeled as a stiff filament with localized flexibility at bends, enabling an on‑off bending mechanism whose dynamics depend on medium viscosity, and a mathematical analysis yields closed‑form expressions for swimming speed, bending moment distribution, and energy expenditure. The observed non‑sinusoidal bending waves consist of constant‑curvature circular arcs separated by near‑straight segments, and the derived speed expression accurately predicts the swimming speed of headless sperm, validating the hydrodynamic model.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Photomicrographs giving greater resolution than previously available have been obtained for the spermatozoa of a sea urchin, a tunicate, and an annelid. The bending waves are not sine waves. They contain circular arcs, in which the amount of bending is constant, separated by shorter regions which are nearly straight. The flagellum must be effectively very stiff to maintain this waveform as it moves through the medium, but this stiffness must be greatly reduced at the junctions between straight and circular regions, where the flagellum is actively bending and unbending. This type of wave pattern may be generated by a simple ‘on-or-off’ activation of bending elements, but the amount of bending which occurs can be influenced by environmental conditions, such as the viscosity of the medium. A mathematical analysis of the wave movement can be carried out more easily than with sinusoidal waves, and expressions have been obtained for the forward swimming speed, the distribution of bending moment along the flagellum, and the energy expenditure for movement, in terms of the parameters of the waves. The expression for the forward swimming speed accurately predicts the swimming speed of headless spermatozoa, confirming the validity of the hydrodynamic assumptions used in this analysis.

References

13