Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities · 2004 · 231 citations · 1 references
EngineeringArchitectural EngineeringCivil EngineeringBuilding StructuresStructural DynamicsStructural EngineeringBuilding AssessmentBuilding PerformanceBuilding Performance AssessmentNonlinear Structural AnalysisBuilding Safety EvaluationCollapse AnalysisCollapse AssessmentCollapse MechanismsCollapse PotentialProgressive CollapseProgressive Collapse Assessment
Following the collapse of the World Trade Center towers in September 2001, there has been heightened interest among building owners and government entities in evaluating the progressive collapse potential of existing buildings and in designing new buildings to resist this type of collapse. The General Services Administration and Department of Defense have issued general guidelines for evaluating a building’s progressive collapse potential. However, little detailed information is available to enable engineers to confidently perform a systematic progressive collapse analysis satisfying these guidelines. In this paper, we present four successively more sophisticated analysis procedures for evaluating the progressive collapse hazard: linear-elastic static; nonlinear static; linear-elastic dynamic; and nonlinear dynamic. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method. We conclude that the most effective analysis procedure for progressive collapse evaluation incorporates the advantageous parts of all four procedures by systematically applying increasingly comprehensive analysis procedures to confirm that the possibility of progressive collapse is high.
1
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
Edward Cohen · 1990 · 1.4K citations