Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Circulating Monocyte-Platelet Aggregates Are a More Sensitive Marker of In Vivo Platelet Activation Than Platelet Surface P-Selectin

705

Citations

17

References

2001

Year

TLDR

Platelet surface P‑selectin is the traditional marker of platelet activation, yet degranulated platelets rapidly lose P‑selectin in vivo and instead form aggregates with leukocytes. The authors performed two clinical studies in patients with acute coronary syndromes to compare circulating monocyte‑platelet aggregates with P‑selectin‑positive platelets. In baboons, degranulated platelets quickly formed monocyte‑platelet aggregates that persisted, and in human studies after PCI and in acute myocardial infarction patients, circulating monocyte‑platelet aggregates were markedly elevated while P‑selectin‑positive platelets were unchanged, showing that monocyte‑platelet aggregates are a more sensitive marker of in‑vivo platelet activation.

Abstract

Background Platelet surface P-selectin is considered the “gold standard” marker of platelet activation. Degranulated, P-selectin–positive platelets, however, aggregate with leukocytes in vitro and rapidly lose surface P-selectin in vivo. Methods and Results Flow cytometric tracking of autologous, biotinylated platelets in baboons enabled us to directly demonstrate for the first time in vivo that (1) infused degranulated platelets very rapidly form circulating aggregates with monocytes and neutrophils, and (2) 30 minutes after infusion of the degranulated platelets, the percentage of circulating monocytes aggregated with infused platelets persist at high levels, whereas the percentage of circulating neutrophils aggregated with infused platelets and the platelet surface P-selectin of nonaggregated infused platelets return to baseline. We therefore performed 2 clinical studies in patients with acute coronary syndromes. First, after percutaneous coronary intervention (n=10), there was an increased number of circulating monocyte-platelet (and to a lesser extent, neutrophil-platelet) aggregates but not P-selectin–positive platelets. Second, of 93 patients presenting to an Emergency Department with chest pain, patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=9) had more circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates (34.2±10.3% [mean±SEM]) than patients with no AMI (n=84, 19.3±1.4%, P <0.05) and normal control subjects (n=10, 11.5±0.8%, P <0.001). Circulating P-selectin–positive platelets, however, were not increased in chest pain patients with or without AMI. Conclusions As demonstrated by 3 independent means (in vivo tracking of activated platelets in baboons, human coronary intervention, and human AMI), circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates are a more sensitive marker of in vivo platelet activation than platelet surface P-selectin.

References

YearCitations

Page 1