Journal of Peace Research · 1988 · 46 citations · 7 references
Public AffairsEconomicsPublic FinanceDevelopment EconomicsEconomic DevelopmentEducation FinanceBudget AnalysisDefense ExpenditureEducation ExpenditureHealth ExpenditurePublic Expenditure AnalysisPublic Expenditure PolicyBudget IncreasesDefence ExpenditureDefense BudgetsDefense Expenditure AnalysisDefense Expenditure PolicyDefense Spending DeterminantsGovernment Health ExpenditureGovernment Health Spending
Abstract It is commonly believed that defence expenditures have a particular ability to compete government financial resources away from other activities, especially education and health. This article uses a number of methods to test for the existence and strength of such trade-offs in a large number of LDCs. Cross- sectional analysis of government expenditures found that few countries which were low defence spenders were high spenders on education/health (and vice versa). Defence expenditures were no less vulnerable to overall budget cuts, nor more likely to gain from budget increases than education and health. Finally, a longitudinal regression analysis for twelve Asian countries revealed little evidence of trade-offs We discuss some of the reasons why our analysis may not support the conventional view on trade-offs and, finally, make a number of suggestions concerning future research on this topic.
7