European Journal of Anaesthesiology · 2006 · 24 citations · 27 references
MedicinePhysiologySurgeryCardiothoracic SurgeryCritical Care AnesthesiologyHemodynamic ManagementCardiopulmonary BypassPositive End-expiratory PressureGastric Mucosal PerfusionIndocyanine Green ImagingPositive End-expiratory Pressure EffectsSplanchnic Blood Flow EffectsSplanchnic Circulation
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may affect hepato-splanchnic blood flow. We studied whether a PEEP of 10 mbar may negatively influence flow-dependent liver function (indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate, ICG-PDR) and splanchnic microcirculation as estimated by gastric mucosal PCO2 (PRCO2). METHODS: In a randomized, controlled clinical study, we enrolled 28 patients after elective cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. In 14 patients (13 male, 1 female; age 48-74, mean 63 +/- 7 yr) we assessed ICG-PDR and PRCO2 on intensive care unit admission with PEEP 5 mbar, after 2 h with PEEP of 10 mbar and again after 2 h at PEEP 5 mbar. Inspiratory peak pressure was adjusted to maintain normocapnia. Fourteen other patients (8 male, 6 female; age 46-86, mean 68 +/- 11 yr) in whom PEEP was 5 mbar throughout served as controls. All patients underwent haemodynamic monitoring by measurement of central venous pressure, left atrial pressure and cardiac index using pulmonary artery thermodilution. RESULTS: While doses of vasoactive drugs and cardiac filling pressures did not change significantly, cardiac index slightly increased in both groups. ICG-PDR remained unchanged either within or between both groups (PEEP10 group: 24.0 +/- 6.9, 22.0 +/- 7.9 and 25.5 +/- 7.7% min-1 vs. controls: 22.0 +/- 7.5, 23.8 +/- 8.4 and 21.4 +/- 6.5% min-1) (P = 0.05). The difference between PRCO2 and end-tidal PCO2 (PCO2-gap) did not change significantly (PEEP10 group: 1.1 +/- 0.9, 1.3 +/- 0.7 and 1.3 +/- 0.9 kPa vs. controls: 0.8 +/- 0.5, 0.9 +/- 0.5 and 0.9 +/- 0.5 kPa). CONCLUSION: A PEEP of 10 mbar for 2 h does not compromise liver function and gastric mucosal perfusion in patients after cardiac surgery with maintained cardiac output.
27
Hemodynamic Responses to Mechanical Ventilation with PEEP
J Qvist, Henning Pontoppidan, Roger S. Wilson et al. · Anesthesiology · 1975 · 441 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Anesthesia +13
Samir G. Sakka, Konrad Reinhart, Andreas Meier‐Hellmann · Intensive Care Medicine · 2000 · 372 citations
Medicine, Physiology, Pulmonology +14
Effects of Positive End-expiratory Pressure on the Gradient for Venous Return
H Fessler, Roy G. Brower, Robert A. Wise et al. · American Review of Respiratory Disease · 1991 · 155 citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Physiology +15