Spatial packing, cranial base angulation, and craniofacial shape variation in the mammalian skull: testing a new model using mice

Daniel E. Lieberman, Benedikt Hallgrímsson, Wei Liu, Trish E. Parsons, Heather A. Jamniczky

Journal of Anatomy · 2008 · 162 citations · 54 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Craniofacial shape variation is thought to be influenced by spatial packing, a hypothesis long studied in comparative anatomy, especially in primates. The study develops and tests three spatial‑packing models to determine how cranial base angle is affected by brain and facial size variation. The models are evaluated in mouse strains carrying mutations that alter craniofacial growth. The study finds that the mouse cranial base flexes to accommodate larger brain size, extends less to accommodate larger face size, and that interactions among brain size, face size, and cranial base dimensions explain much of cranial base angle variation, underscoring its central role in craniofacial covariation.

Abstract

The hypothesis that variation in craniofacial shape within and among species is influenced by spatial packing has a long history in comparative anatomy, particularly in terms of primates. This study develops and tests three alternative models of spatial packing to address how and to what extent the cranial base angle is influenced by variation in brain and facial size. The models are tested using mouse strains with different mutations affecting craniofacial growth. Although mice have distinctive crania with small brains, long faces, and retroflexed cranial bases, the results of the study indicate that the mouse cranial base flexes to accommodate larger brain size relative to cranial base length. In addition, the mouse cranial base also extends, but to a lesser degree, to accommodate larger face size relative to cranial base length. In addition, interactions between brain size, face size, and the widths and lengths of the components of the cranial base account for a large percentage of variation in cranial base angle. The results illustrate the degree to which the cranial base is centrally embedded within the covariation structure of the craniofacial complex as a whole.

References

54