Englishization and contact linguistics

Braj Β. Kachru

World Englishes · 1994 · 127 citations · 35 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The spread of English is multidimensional, shaped by diverse sociolinguistic contexts, ambivalent attitudes, and the emergence of contact literatures across world Englishes. The study argues that interdisciplinary research into world literatures, literary creativity, genre innovation, thematic expansion, stylistic strategies, ideology, and power is required to explore English's pervasive impact, and it also highlights Englishization in applied contact linguistics. The paper structures its discussion into sections on spheres of Englishization, deficit versus dominance hypotheses, exponents, beyond‑sentence phenomena, great versus little traditions, thematic range and experimentation, code development, linguistic schizophrenia, and contact linguistics and language policies.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This issue‐oriented paper presents several dimensions of the hegemony of the English language across some of the world's major languages, and their implications for various approaches to contact linguistics. The importance of the issues raised here is related to the multidimensional character of the spread of English; the unique sociolinguistic contexts of English across cultures; the ‘love‐hate’ attitudes toward the language; and the development of CONTACT LITERATURES in world Englishes (e.g., in South and West Asia, South, West and East Africa). It is argued that, to explore the all‐pervasive impact of English, interdisciplinary research is needed on various literatures of the world; processes of literary creativity; introduction of new or modified literary genres; expansion of the thematic range; patterning of the discoursal and stylistic strategies, and issues of ideology and power. The discussion is divided into the following major sections: The spheres of Englishization; Deficit vs. dominance hypothesis; Exponents of Englishization; Englishization beyond the sentence; ‘Great tradition’ vs. ‘Little tradition’; Thematic range and literary experimentation; Englishization and code development; Englishization and linguistic schizophrenia; Contact linguistics and language policies. Finally, as an aside, the paper draws attention to Englishization and APPLIED contact linguistics.

References

35