The Journal of Asian Studies · 1972 · 34 citations · 1 references
HumanitiesHistoryMedieval StudiesAsian HistoryAsian StudiesHistoriographyChinese Dynastic HistoryHistory Of Historical WritingChronological RevisionsEarly Dynastic Chronology
In a 1926 article Wada Sei criticized the chronology of early Ming history given in the Ming T'ai-tsu shih-lu and other official sources. His conclusions have won general acceptance. Wada based his revisions on the Chi-shih-lu of Yu Pen, a lost work surviving only in fragmentary quotation. Recently, a more extensive text of the latter has come to light, and internal analysis of the longer text shows that its chronology is too confused for any of the Chi-shih-lu to be reliable as a corrective to the official sources. This removes the evidential basis for Wada's revised chronology, and requires the substitution for it of the order of events given in the Ming T'ai-tsu shih-lu .
1