Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2012 · 224 citations · 27 references
PharmacyHealth InformaticsHealth CommunicationHealth Services ResearchOutcomes ResearchDiabetes ManagementPatient Portal SystemsDigital Patient-provider CommunicationHealthcare Provider CommunicationSecure Messaging
Patient portal use is linked to favorable outcomes, yet little is known about how patients specifically use and benefit from portal features. The study used mixed‑methods to investigate how adults with type 2 diabetes use and benefit from secure messaging within a patient portal. Researchers performed thematic analysis of focus‑group transcripts to identify benefits and barriers of secure messaging and examined the association between portal feature use and glycemic control. Participants reported that secure messaging enhanced satisfaction, visit efficiency, and access to care, but barriers included beliefs, prior negative experiences, and provider expectations; higher use of messaging for appointments was associated with better glycemic control, suggesting that provider communication about messaging is essential for clinical benefit.
Patient portal use has been associated with favorable outcomes, but we know less about how patients use and benefit from specific patient portal features.Using mixed-methods, we explored how adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) use and benefit from secure messaging (SM) within a patient portal.Adults with T2DM who had used a patient portal participated in a focus group and completed a survey (n=39) or completed a survey only (n=15). We performed thematic analysis of focus group transcripts to identify the benefits of and barriers to using SM within a portal. We also examined the association between use of various patient portal features and patients' glycemic control.Participants were on average 57.1 years old; 65% were female; 76% were Caucasian/White, and 20% were African American/Black. Self-reported benefits of SM within a portal included enhanced patient satisfaction, enhanced efficiency and quality of face-to-face visits, and access to clinical care outside traditional face-to-face visits. Self-reported barriers to using SM within a portal included preconceived beliefs or rules about SM and prior negative experiences with SM. Participants' assumptions about providers' opinions about SM and providers' instructions about SM also influenced use. Greater self-reported use of SM to manage a medical appointment was significantly associated with patients' glycemic control (ρ=-0.29, p=0.04).SM within a portal may facilitate access to care, enhance the quality of office visits, and be associated with patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes for patients with diabetes, but provider communication about SM is essential.
27
Urmimala Sarkar, Andrew J. Karter, Junyan Liu et al. · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2011 · 457 citations · Full text
Public Health, Health Informatics, Public Health Informatics +17
Andrea Hassol, James M. Walker, David Kidder et al. · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2004 · 439 citations · Full text
Computing, Health Informatics, Electronic Health Records +13
Urmimala Sarkar, Andrew J. Karter, Jennifer Y. Liu et al. · Journal of Health Communication · 2010 · 385 citations · Full text