C<scp>URRENT</scp>C<scp>ONTROVERSIES IN</scp>F<scp>EMINIST</scp>T<scp>HEORY</scp>

Mary G. Dietz

Annual Review of Political Science · 2003 · 142 citations · 155 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Academic feminism has diversified and fragmented over the past two decades due to many new theoretical approaches. This overview assesses feminist theory’s contestations around gender, identity, and subjectivity. The authors analyze three opposing perspectives—difference, diversity, and deconstruction feminism—to explore how they frame the female subject, sexual difference, sex‑gender relations, intersectionality, and the political category of women, while also addressing epistemic identification and debates over feminist citizenship, recognition, equality, cultural rights, multiculturalism, and democracy. The field remains far from convergence, yet its ongoing debates signal its vitality and significance in contemporary social and political theory.

Abstract

▪ Abstract Over the past two decades, academic feminism has differentiated and fragmented substantially in light of a wide range of new approaches in theory. This overview and assessment of the wide, diverse, and changing field of feminist theory gives particular attention to contestations surrounding the political theorizing of gender, identity, and subjectivity. Three divergent and oppositional perspectives—difference feminism, diversity feminism, and deconstruction feminism—frame current discussions regarding the “construction” of the female subject; the nature of sexual difference; the relation between sex and gender; the intersection of gender, race, class, sexuality, etc.; and the significance of “women” as a political category in feminism. The problem of epistemic identification (locating or dislocating the female subject, analyzing gender difference, politicizing identity) is also a central element in the theorizing of feminist politics, multicultural citizenship, justice, power, and the democratic public sphere. Within this domain, we find equally intense debates among feminist theorists concerning the meaning of feminist citizenship and the politics of recognition, as well as the relations between gender equality and cultural rights, feminism and multiculturalism, democracy and difference. Although the field is far from convergence even on the meaning of feminism itself, we might take its current state as a sign of its vitality and significance within the discourses of contemporary social and political theory.

References

155