What Do You Mean, “Epigenetic”?

Carrie Deans, Keith A. Maggert

Genetics · 2015 · 514 citations · 83 references

DOIFull text

Open access

TL;DR

Interest in epigenetics has surged over the past decade, spreading the term into diverse biomedical, ecological, physiological, and popular contexts, yet differing definitions have hampered cross‑field communication and synthesis. The article aims to clarify the field by examining the historical evolution of epigenetic definitions, dissecting their components, and proposing strategies to resolve definitional ambiguities. The authors review the literature on epigenetic terminology, analyze the conceptual elements of each definition, and suggest practical guidelines to standardize usage and improve methodological consistency.

Abstract

Abstract Interest in the field of epigenetics has increased rapidly over the last decade, with the term becoming more identifiable in biomedical research, scientific fields outside of the molecular sciences, such as ecology and physiology, and even mainstream culture. It has become increasingly clear, however, that different investigators ascribe different definitions to the term. Some employ epigenetics to explain changes in gene expression, others use it to refer to transgenerational effects and/or inherited expression states. This disagreement on a clear definition has made communication difficult, synthesis of epigenetic research across fields nearly impossible, and has in many ways biased methodologies and interpretations. This article discusses the history behind the multitude of definitions that have been employed since the conception of epigenetics, analyzes the components of these definitions, and offers solutions for clarifying the field and mitigating the problems that have arisen due to these definitional ambiguities.

References

83