Annals of Internal Medicine · 2003 · 1.9K citations · 18 references
Health ProfessionsInjury PreventionInjury SurveillancePatient SafetyRisk AssessmentAdverse Event AnalysisPatient Safety OutcomesPost-discharge Follow-upAcute Adverse EventsPatient Safety IncidentsPost-discharge Outcomes MeasurementPost-discharge Risk AssessmentPost-discharge SafetyProspective Cohort DataSerious Adverse Events
BACKGROUND: Studies of hospitalized patients identify safety as a significant problem, but few data are available regarding injuries occurring after discharge. Patients may be vulnerable during this transition period. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence, severity, preventability, and "ameliorability" of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital and to develop strategies for improving patient safety during this interval. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary care academic hospital. PATIENTS: 400 consecutive patients discharged home from the general medical service. MEASUREMENTS: The three main outcomes were adverse events, defined as injuries occurring as a result of medical management; preventable adverse events, defined as adverse events judged to have been caused by an error; and ameliorable adverse events, defined as adverse events whose severity could have been decreased. Posthospital course was determined by performing a medical record review and a structured telephone interview approximately 3 weeks after each patient's discharge. Outcomes were determined by independent physician reviews. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients had adverse events after discharge (19% [95% CI, 15% to 23%]). Of these, 23 had preventable adverse events (6% [CI, 4% to 9%]) and 24 had ameliorable adverse events (6% [CI, 4% to 9%]). Three percent of injuries were serious laboratory abnormalities, 65% were symptoms, 30% were symptoms associated with a nonpermanent disability, and 3% were permanent disabilities. Adverse drug events were the most common type of adverse event (66% [CI, 55% to 76%]), followed by procedure-related injuries (17% [CI, 8% to 26%]). Of the 25 adverse events resulting in at least a nonpermanent disability, 12 were preventable (48% [CI, 28% to 68%]) and 6 were ameliorable (24% [CI, 7% to 41%]). CONCLUSION: Adverse events occurred frequently in the peridischarge period, and many could potentially have been prevented or ameliorated with simple strategies.
18
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
BMJ · 2001 · 10.8K citations
Andrew Wall · British Journal of Healthcare Management · 2000 · 5.9K citations
Health Professions, Health Policy, Health Services Administration +8
The Nature of Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients
Lucian L. Leape, Troyen A. Brennan, Nan M. Laird et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1991 · 3.8K citations
Incidence and Types of Adverse Events and Negligent Care in Utah and Colorado
Eric J. Thomas, David M. Studdert, Helen Burstin et al. · Medical Care · 2000 · 1.7K citations
Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group